Evidence Hub

Omadacycline for Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (OPTIC-2): A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial

Thomas M. File, Keith S. Kaye, Skliarov Ihor, Iryna O. Hovbakh, Vakhtang Katsarava, C. Kirsch, K. Soni, Kalpana Gupta et al.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2025

336 participants

Abstract

Abstract RATIONALE: Omadacycline is an FDA-approved intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) treatment for adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. METHODS: Conducted as part of postmarketing regulatory commitments, this phase 3b, double-blind, global study compared omadacycline versus moxifloxacin for the treatment of adults with CABP (PORT Risk Class III or IV; NCT04779242). Patients with known COVID-19 were excluded. Treatment was either omadacycline 100 mg IV q12h × 2 doses (or 200 mg IV once) on Day 1, thereafter 100 mg IV q24h; or moxifloxacin 400 mg IV q24h. After ≥2 days’ IV treatment, patients could transition to PO therapy (omadacycline 300 mg q24h or moxifloxacin 400 mg q12h); total treatment duration was 7-10 days (up to 14 days if baseline bacteremia). The primary endpoint, early clinical response (ECR; 72-120 hours after first dose), was defined as survival, no receipt of rescue antibacterial therapy, and improvement in ≥2 of 4 symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea) without deterioration in any of these symptoms. Secondary endpoints included investigator's assessment of clinical response at end of treatment (EOT; 0-2 days after last dose) and post-therapy evaluation (PTE; 5-10 days after last dose), defined as survival with resolution of signs and symptoms of infection such that further antibacterial therapy was unnecessary. RESULTS: From 2021 to 2024, 670 patients were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 336 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free