Evidence Hub

The effects of non-insulin anti-diabetic medications on the diabetic microvascular complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Wen S, Yuan Y, Li Y, Xu C, Chen L, Ren Y, Wang C, He Y et al.

BMC endocrine disorders, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Although the onset and progression of diabetic microvascular complications are linked to glycemic control, various antihyperglycemic drugs with distinct treatment targets may positively impact microvascular lesions beyond their glucose-lowering effects. Therefore, this systematic review emphasizes the clinical therapeutic implications of non-insulin anti-diabetic medications for diabetic microvascular complications.

Methods: We retrieved published literature reporting randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the effects of microvascular complications, including diabetic nephropathy (DN), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and diabetic retinopathy (DR), from authenticated clinical databases: PubMed, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Web of Science. We synthesized data, including the continuous variable indices: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), and urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE). Indices measuring cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN), vibration detection threshold (VDT), and retinal nerve fiber thickness (RNFL) were used to calculate microvascular effects. We also synthesized dichotomous variable indices, including the risks for DR and DPN.

Results: According to our analyses, there was sparse evidence strongly supporting that metformin (MET), Sulfonylurea (SUs), Repaglinide (Repa), or α-Glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs) could benefit diabetic microvascular complications when adopted as…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free