Evidence Hub

Conjunctival concentrations of a new ophthalmic solution formulation of moxifloxacin 0.5% in cataract surgery patients

Lindstrom R, Lane S, Cottingham A, Smith S, Sall K, Silverstein S, Shettle L, Walters T et al.

Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2010

11 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the conjunctival concentrations of moxifloxacin after instillation of a single drop of moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution, 0.5% (Moxi) or a new 0.5% ophthalmic solution formulation (MAF) containing a retention-enhancing agent in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study. One hundred thirty patients scheduled for routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were randomized to both treatment and post-dose sample collection time points. A single topical drop of Moxi or MAF was instilled in the study eye. At the designated time (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 5 h post-dose), 2 conjunctival biopsy samples were obtained (N = 11-13 per treatment condition). Concentrations of moxifloxacin were determined using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography method. Moxifloxacin exposure [maximum mean moxifloxacin concentrations (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)] was estimated from the observed concentration-time data.

RESULTS: The conjunctival moxifloxacin C(max), 43.8 μg/g, for MAF was achieved at 0.25 h. This was 1.8-fold higher than the C(max) for Moxi (24.1 μg/g), which was reached at 0.5 h post-dose. MAF AUC(0-3) was significantly greater than the AUC(0-3) of Moxi [50.5 (μg·h)/g vs. 27.1 (μg·h)/g; P < 0.05]. The conjunctival moxifloxacin C(max) for MAF was 337- to 730-fold greater than the reported minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(90)) values for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free