Evidence Hub

2228. Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) in Patients with Diabetes: Outcomes from a Global Phase 3 Study of Delafloxacin (DLX)

I. Kaidashev, M. Niţu, M. Popescu, L. Lawrence, M. Quintas, Yang Li, S. Cammarata

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2019

131 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background Delafloxacin (DLX) is an IV/oral anionic fluoroquinolone with no QT restrictions. It is approved for the treatment of serious skin infections including those due to MRSA and Gram-negative pathogens. A Phase 3 trial of patients with CABP was recently completed comparing DLX to moxifloxacin (MOX), including patients with diabetes (DM). Methods Multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of adults with CABP with at least 2 clinical symptoms; physical signs; and radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Patients were randomized 1:1 to DLX or MOX treatment for 5–10 days. Patients received a minimum of 3 days of IV treatment, then were switched to oral at MD discretion. Key endpoints were the Early Clinical Response (ECR) at 96 ±24h and the investigator assessment of response at Test of Cure (TOC) 5–10 days after last dose in the Intent to Treat population. Clinical success was defined as complete or near resolution of signs and symptoms and no further antibiotics needed per investigator assessment. Results 131 DM patients were randomized. Patient characteristics: 59% male; mean age 66 (26% ≥ age 75); 40% PORT class IV/V; 29% multi-lobar pneumonia. Bacterial pathogens were identified in 59% at baseline. Patients received treatment ~8.5 days. DLX was comparable to MOX in patients with DM, with response at ECR 90% DLX vs. 88.5% MOX [1.5 (95% CI -9.6, 13.2)] as well as Clinical Success at TOC 87.1% DLX vs. 86.9% MOX [0.3 (95% CI −11.6, 12.7)]. The overall % of DM…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 131 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free