Evidence Hub

The clinical efficacy of lefamulin in the treatment of elderly patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

Hung-Jen Tang, Chih-Cheng Lai, C. Chao

Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2020

517 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

J Thorac Dis 2020;12(8):4588-4590 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-19-3805 Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) remains a common cause of elderly patients requiring hospitalization and it can also be associated with significant morbidity and mortality (1-3). Common causative pathogens of CAPB include typical pathogens—Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis , and the atypical pathogens— Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila. Appropriate antibiotics are the key of successful management of elderly patients with CABP (2), however, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance among these respiratory pathogens limits the choice of antibiotic and could negatively impact the outcomes of the elderly patients with CAPB. Fortunately, recent development of a novel antibiotic— lefamulin, the first systemic pleuromutilin antibiotic, is active against the most common CABP-causing pathogens, including both typical and atypical pathogens and can provide us a therapeutic alternative in this clinical entity (4). In addition to in vitro studies (5,6), two phase III studies— Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 1 trial (7) and LEAP 2 trial (8) have reported the clinical efficacy and safety profile of lefamulin for treating CABP. However, the usefulness of lefamulin in the elderly patients remains unclear. Therefore, we extracted the results of LEAP 1 and 2 trials (7,8) for the elderly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 517 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free