Evidence Hub

Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in Florida

Pasikhova Y, Snyder M, Morrison A, Handley G, Syed M, Cannella AP

Open forum infectious diseases, 2026

93 participants

Abstract

Background: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are environmental organisms that become opportunistic pathogens in certain populations. NTM prevalence has increased globally, likely due to increased diagnostic testing and the availability of population-based studies. Current literature on oncology patients is minimal and represents a unique study area. Here we present the epidemiology and treatment of NTM infection cases at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center.

Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults with microbiologically proven NTM infections presenting from 2020 to 2023. Epidemiologic and treatment-related data were retrieved from the electronic medical record and evaluated to illustrate institutional patterns.

Results: A total of 93 patients met assessment criteria, with most (74 of 93 [80%]) having a past or active cancer. Mycobacterium avium complex (47 of 93 [51%]) and Mycobacterium abscessus group (28 of 93 [30%]) were the most common isolates. The majority were pulmonary infections (75 of 93 [81%]), with the integument accounting for most extrapulmonary sites (14 of 18 [78%]). Of 93 patients, 49 (53%]) received therapy, with many (41 of 49 [84%]) receiving ≥3 agents. Thirty-nine (80%]) required an initial regimen modification, and 13 (27%) received dual β-lactam therapy (frequently including meropenem). Of treated patients, 36 (73%) demonstrated improved symptoms, 18 (37%) improved or partially improved…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 93 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free