Evidence Hub

Impact of the US Food and Drug Administration warning regarding increased risk of aortic aneurysms or aortic dissections on fluoroquinolone prescribing trends

Rizk JG, Slejko JF, Heil EL, Seo D, Qato DM, Qato DM

BMJ open quality, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning in December 2018 regarding an increased risk of aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections associated with fluoroquinolone (FQ) use. This warning specifically targeted older adults and patients with conditions such as hypertension, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, atherosclerosis, peripheral vascular disease and history of aneurysms.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the safety warning on prescribing trends of FQs in the targeted population.

Methods: This cross-sectional study with an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis (January 2018-December 2019) used a 25% random sample of IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics health plan claims database. The impact of the warning on FQ utilisation was quantified among the targeted population and a non-targeted population.

Results: From 2018 to 2019, both study populations saw a decrease in the year-over-year percent change of FQ prescriptions per 100 000 beneficiaries (-11%, from 14 227 to 12 662, targeted; -15%, from 5227 to 4446, non-targeted) and proportion of FQ use versus other antibiotics (from 15.6% to 13.8%, targeted; from 9.4% to 8%, non-targeted). In the targeted population, the ITS analysis did not show a significant trend change, a change in level or postwarning trend in the monthly rate of FQ prescriptions per 1000 beneficiaries. A positive trend change was observed in the non-targeted population (0.07, <0.01-0.13), but there were no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free