Evidence Hub

The Actual Clinical Situation Ruthlessly Exposes the Challenge of Rational Care for Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Infections and Requires Even More Efforts for Satisfactory Antibiotic Stewardship

Diebner HH, Wallrafen AM, Timmesfeld N, Rahmel T, Nowak H

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the 10 most pressing health problems worldwide. Methods: First steps toward harnessing the complex dynamics of antibiotic resistance are presented. To accomplish this, we first shift down a gear and try to understand the actual driving dynamics behind the development of resistance in a specific clinical department. Analyses are based on the clinical and microbiological data of a German hospital over an observation period of more than 7 years, which we evaluate descriptively and semi-quantitatively in order to obtain a basis for informed and intelligent action in terms of antibiotic stewardship. Results: The specific results include the observed increase in the resistance rate with increasing overall consumption, while increases over time independent of consumption are fairly moderate. Vancocymin and refoximin are an exception in the development of resistance, as resistance to these substances appears to decrease with increasing consumption. However, there have been substantial dose adjustments for these substances, which are likely to be decisive here. An intra-host increase in resistance due to treatment time on the one hand and repeated treatments on the other is observed. Within the sub-cohort of ineffectively treated patients, i.e., with resistance to the antibiotic, mortality increases on average, but with ampicillin/sulbactam as a striking exception. Patients with infections caused by ampicillin-resistant bacteria have a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free