Evidence Hub

Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia: comparison of incidence, epidemiology, and clinical outcome in a pre- and post-COVID-19 period

Bedini A, Di Trapani MD, Franceschi G, Zona S, Meschiari M, Soffritti A, Simion M, Franceschini E et al.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025

150 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of severe bacterial infections, including pneumonia, meningitis, and bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical, epidemiological and outcome manifestations of patients admitted with S. pneumoniae bacteremia (SPB) in the pre- and post-COVID-19 period.

Methods: The study analyzed all patients admitted in Province of Modena, Italy, during two time-periods: pre-COVID-19 (Jan 2018- Feb 2020) and post-COVID-19 (Mar 2020- Jun 2022) period. The data were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 150 patients with SPB were included, 109 and 41 patients in the pre- and post-COVID-19, respectively. We observed a decrease in SPB incidence from March 2020, after the implementation of the restrictive measures for the COVID-19 pandemic, and a new increase since Jun 2021, when lockdown measures were fully lifted. SPB was associated with pneumonia in 128 patients (85.3%), meningitis in 25 (16.7%) and otitis-mastoiditis in 14 (9.3%). The proportion of patients presenting with multi-lobar pneumonia significantly increased during the post-COVID-19 period (39.0% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.008). Thirty-day mortality rate resulted higher in the post-COVID-19 period (24.4% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.075), and multivariate analysis identified an age ≥ 80 years (OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.12-17.61, p = 0.033), multi-lobar pneumonia (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.56-12.07, p = 0.005), and central nervous system disease (OR 3.63, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 150 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free