Evidence Hub

Case report: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of rare Nocardia aobensis infection in a patient with immune thrombocytopenia

Liang X, Liu X, Huang Z, Qiu F, Jiang Y, Li C, Deng Z, Wu J

Frontiers in medicine, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nocardiosis poses a diagnostic challenge due to its rarity in clinical practice, non-specific clinical symptoms and imaging features, and the limitations of traditional detection methods. Nocardia aobensis (N. aobensis) is rarely detected in clinical samples. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers significant advantages over traditional methods for rapid and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases, especially for rare pathogens.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old woman with a history of immune thrombocytopenia for over 2 years was hospitalized for recurrent fever and cough lasting for 10 days. Her initial diagnosis on admission was community-acquired pneumonia, based on chest computed tomography findings of lung inflammation lesion. Empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) was initiated. However, her condition failed to improve significantly even after 1 week of treatment. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) subjected to mNGS revealed the presence of N. aobensis, resulting in a diagnosis of pulmonary nocardiosis caused by N. aobensis. This diagnosis was also supported by Sanger sequencing of the BALF. After adjusting the antibiotic regimen to include TMP-SMZ in combination with imipenem, the patient's condition significantly improved. She was finally discharged with instructions to continue oral treatment with TMP-SMZ and linezolid for 6 months. The patient's first follow-up 1 month after discharge showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free