Evidence Hub

Metagenomic analysis identifying a polymicrobial pulmonary infection in a non-HIV immunocompromised patient: a case report

Duan J, Ding J, Wei Y, Zhang Y, You Z, Li D, Chen C

BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polymicrobial pulmonary infections, common in immunocompromised patients, often manifest more severe symptoms than monomicrobial infections. Clinical diagnosis delays may lead to mortality, emphasizing the importance of fast and accurate diagnosis for these patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), as an unbiased method capable of detecting all microbes, is a valuable tool to identify pathogens, particularly in cases where infections are difficult to diagnosis using conventional methods.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old male patient was admitted due to cough, expectoration and dyspnea. CT scan revealed diffuse inflammatory and cavernous lung lesion, and blood examination suggested a polymicrobial infection. However, no etiology was found by routine examination. mNGS of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF)simultaneously detected the presence of Pneumocystis jirovecii (P.jirovecii), Aspergillus fumigates (A.fumigates), Nocardia farcinica (N.farcinica), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (S.enterica subsp. enterica), and cytomegalovirus (CMV). The patient was successfully treated with compound sulfamethoxazole (SMZ-TMP), cefoperazone/sulbactam (SCF), moxifloxacin (MXF), voriconazole (VCZ), and ganciclovir. The patient recovered after two weeks of anti-infection therapy and maintained good health at a six-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION: For immunocompromised patients with multiple infections and atypical symptoms, mNGS emerged as a reliable approach to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free