Evidence Hub

Case Report: Coinfection of influenza A and Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia

Feng B, Chen Y, Chen Y, Feng J, Yu Z, Guo F, Ruan J

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

Abstract

The coinfection of influenza A and Chlamydia psittaci pneumoniae is rarely described in China. However, the clinical features of these diseases pose a significant diagnostic challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to report and review such a potentially fatal case. We report an 89-year-old male patient requiring admission to the intensive care unit with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, shock and MODS. He presented with fever, fatigue, anorexia and dyspnea. The patient exhibited severe hypoxemia, shock, hepatic dysfunction (elevated liver enzymes and serum bilirubin), acute kidney injury and a SOFA score of 17. Mechanical ventilation (MV) and venous-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) were established for respiratory support. The initial diagnosis focused on influenza A for his positive influenza A nucleic acid. However, the patient's imaging presentation was not coupled with viral pneumonia, which raised suspicion for other pathogens. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) detected coinfection of C psittaci , influenza A H3N2 virus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Concurrent targeted NGS (tNGS) detected C. psittaci in blood. Omadacycline and baloxavir marboxil were prescribed. The patient's condition improved, and he was successfully weaned from VV-ECMO and MV. He was discharged and recovered on day 60 of the follow-up. This case underscores the diagnostic complexity of coinfection and the use of NGS testing in this severe…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free