Evidence Hub

Development of Benzo[b]thiophene Linked-Oxadiazole Derivatives for Potential Antimicrobial and Anti-TB Targets: Evaluation of ADME-Tox and In-silico Docking

Nagaraju Madala, Vishal Sharma, Srilalitha Vinnakota

Journal of Advanced Chemical Sciences, 2026

Abstract

The present work reports the synthesis of new bis-oxadiazole-bearing benzo[b]thiophene derivatives as well as assessments of their antimicrobial and antitubercular activity through both in vitro and in silico approaches. The novel benzo[b]thiophene-based oxadiazole derivatives (7a−7k) were synthesized via a three-step path involving the preparation of thioacetonitrile, followed by the conversion to acetimidamide, and finally cyclization with various functionalized benzoic acids. The structural elucidation of the prepared benzo[b]thiophene compounds was established by ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, and HRMS spectroscopic analysis. In vitro antimicrobial activity against Gram-(–ve), Gram(+ve) and fungal microorganisms and antitubercular effect on the H37Rv strain were assessed for each synthesized compound. It was revealed that compound 7f showed well-established antibacterial affinities on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa with zones of inhibition of 39.95±0.82 and 37.29±0.33 mm in comparison to the reference drug gemifloxacin (37.02±0.92 and 36.10±2.17 mm). Notably, compounds 7c and 7h displayed the highest antifungal activity among the tested compounds, with selectivity towards the C. albicans ZI values of 30.15±0.28 and 31.37±1.32 mm, with respects to CLZ (ZI = 29.36±1.15 mm). Among them, oxadiazole conjugates 7a (MIC = 5.80 μM), 7f (2.89 μM), and 7h (3.10 μM) showed potent anti-TB activity on the tested H37Rv compared to the conventional drug STM. Moreover, in silico molecular docking…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free