Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy of vibegron in pediatric patients with treatment-resistant nocturnal enuresis: a multicenter retrospective study

Hirokazu Ikeda, Yoshitaka Watanabe, Y. Ohtomo, Hiroki Miyano, S. Fujinaga, Yusuke Gonda, Atsuko Hata, S. Tsuji et al.

Translational Pediatrics, 2025

387 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background Nocturnal enuresis (NE) is a common chronic condition in children. Although enuresis alarms and desmopressin are the first-line treatments recommended by clinical guidelines, 20–40% of affected children demonstrate inadequate response and require additional therapeutic interventions. β3-adrenoceptor agonists are emerging as promising alternatives to anticholinergics, offering a more favorable safety profile with a lower incidence of common side effects. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of vibegron in children with treatment-resistant NE (TR-NE) and compare different treatment strategies. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted at 12 hospitals affiliated with the Japanese Society on Enuresis and Incontinence. It enrolled children aged 5–18 years who received vibegron (50 mg once daily) for refractory NE between November 2018 and December 2021. The median treatment duration was 245 (interquartile range, 126–484) days. The primary outcome was treatment efficacy, assessed by the change in the number of wet nights over 30 days from baseline to 1 month. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events. Treatment response was defined using the International Children’s Continence Society criteria. Patients were classified into an “add-on” group (vibegron combined with existing therapy) or a “switch” group (transitioned from prior anticholinergics to vibegron). Results Of the 387 children enrolled,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 387 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free