Evidence Hub

Clinically Meaningful Improvements With Vibegron in Men With Overactive Bladder and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Responder Analysis of the Phase 3 COURAGE Trial

Kenneth M. Peters, Janet Owens-Grillo, Elizabeth Thomas, David Staskin, E. Rovner, Salim Mujais

Urology, 2025

1,105 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the impact of vibegron treatment in the phase 3 COURAGE trial (NCT03902080) on clinically meaningful response parameters in men with overactive bladder (OAB) receiving pharmacological therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as measured by standard, validated patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Men >45 years with OAB receiving pharmacotherapy for BPH were randomly assigned 1:1 to vibegron 75 mg or placebo for 24 weeks. Participants completed bladder diaries assessing changes in micturition frequency, nocturia, and urge urinary incontinence (UUI); International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); and OAB questionnaire (OAB-q). Post hoc analyses assessed percentage of responders (ie, ≤8 daily micturitions, ≤1 nightly nocturia episodes, ≤1 daily UUI episodes, ≥3-point decrease in IPSS scores, >10-point improvement in OAB-q subscale scores). Responder endpoints were analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel common risk difference estimation.

RESULTS

Of 1105 participants, 1080 were included in the analysis (vibegron, n=538; placebo, n=542). At week 12, greater percentages of participants receiving vibegron vs placebo achieved responder endpoints for micturitions (33.3% vs 20.5%, respectively; P<0.0001), nocturia episodes (34.6% vs 26.8%; P=0.0036), and UUI episodes (65.8% vs 53.0%; P=0.0267). At week 12, greater percentages of participants receiving vibegron vs placebo achieved a ≥3-point decrease in IPSS storage, voiding, and total scores and 10-point…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,105 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free