Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Vibegron in Overactive Bladder: A Bayesian Cross‐Trial Synthesis of Benefit Probabilities and Decision Thresholds

Takanobu Yamamoto, Soichiro Yoshida, Shugo Yajima, Hiroshi Fukushima, Yosuke Yasuda, Yuma Waseda, Hiroyuki Sato, Akihiro Hirakawa et al.

LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize published placebo-controlled trials of vibegron monotherapy for overactive bladder (OAB) and quantify posterior probabilities of benefit and decision-threshold exceedance. METHODS: We extracted published placebo-adjusted least-squares mean differences at Week 12 from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trials evaluating vibegron monotherapy (Japan Phase III trial, Korea bridging study [50 mg], and EMPOWUR trial [75 mg]) for four voiding-diary endpoints: micturitions/day, urgency episodes/day, urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes/day, and voided volume (mL). For each endpoint, a Bayesian normal-normal random-effects model estimated the pooled mean effect and between-trial heterogeneity and calculated posterior probabilities of benefit and of exceeding thresholds predefined in this analysis. RESULTS: Pooled mean effects (95% credible intervals) favored vibegron across all four voiding-diary endpoints: micturitions/day (-0.76, -1.33 to -0.28), urgency episodes/day (-0.69, -1.35 to -0.22), UUI episodes/day (-0.44, -0.93 to -0.03), and voided volume (+24.09 mL, 15.78-32.51). The posterior probabilities of benefit were 99.5%, 99.3%, 98.0%, and > 99.9%, respectively. The probabilities of exceeding thresholds were as follows: for micturitions/day, ≤ -0.5: 90.3% and ≤ -1.0: 14.2%; for urgency episodes/day, ≤ -0.5: 82.8% and ≤ -1.0: 12.7%; for UUI episodes/day, ≤ -0.3: 81.8% and ≤ -0.5: 35.4%; and for voided volume, ≥ +10 mL:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free