Evidence Hub

Add-on or switch to vibegron in patients with overactive bladder insufficiently responding to initial 4-week antimuscarinics: a randomised, parallel-group, multicentre trial ( ADVISR ) protocol

Takanobu Yamamoto, Soichiro Yoshida, Yuya Maezawa, Takashi Tamiya, Masahiro Toide, Hiroshi Fukushima, Sho Uehara, Saori Araki et al.

BMJ Open, 2025

110 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a condition characterised by urinary urgency, often accompanied by frequency and nocturia. Antimuscarinics and β3 receptor agonists are first-line therapies that improve urinary symptoms and the quality of life. For insufficient antimuscarinic response, options include dose increase, switching medications or combination therapy. However, evidence for these strategies, especially combinations with vibegron, is limited and needs further study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial conducted in Japan. A total of 110 patients with OAB who met the OAB criteria and did not respond adequately to the initial 4-week antimuscarinic treatment will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: an add-on group in which vibegron 50 mg/day is added to the current antimuscarinic drug and a switch group in which the current antimuscarinics are discontinued and replaced with vibegron 50 mg/day⁠. The primary endpoint is the intergroup comparison of changes in daily urinary frequency between the add-on group and the switch group at 12 weeks after the initiation of protocol treatment. The primary analysis aims to confirm the non-inferiority of the switch group compared with the add-on group using a Bayesian mixed model for repeated measures. Non-inferiority will be confirmed if the posterior probability that the difference in the change in urinary frequency at 12 weeks between the two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free