Evidence Hub

Satisfaction and persistence with vibegron in the first 6 months of overactive bladder treatment: interim results of the phase 4, real-world COMPOSUR study

Dmochowski RR, Rovner ES, Kennelly MJ, Newman DK, Xavier K, Thomas E, Snyder D, Abedinzadeh L

BMC urology, 2025

403 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: The COMPOSUR study is evaluating vibegron for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in a real-world setting. We report results of a prespecified 6-month interim analysis, assessing patient-reported treatment satisfaction, persistence, safety, and tolerability over the first 6 months after receiving a new prescription for vibegron.

Methods: COMPOSUR (NCT05067478) is a 12-month, phase 4 study of vibegron. Patients were enrolled if they were ≥ 18 years of age with OAB, initiating vibegron after previously receiving anticholinergics (Cohort A) or mirabegron with/without anticholinergics (Cohort B). Satisfaction was assessed via the OAB Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT-q; domain scores on 0-100 scale, higher scores denoting greater satisfaction). The primary endpoint is the OAB-SAT-q satisfaction domain score. The key secondary endpoints are the percentage of positive responses to OAB-SAT-q questions 1-3 and 11. Additional secondary endpoints include OAB-SAT-q scores for side effects, endorsement, preference, and convenience. Persistence was assessed as an exploratory endpoint. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs).

Results: A total of 403 patients were enrolled and initiated treatment with vibegron; 104 patients discontinued the study before month 6, most commonly owing to withdrawal of consent (n = 32) and AEs (n = 8). Mean (SD) patient age was 56.1 (12.5) years, and 29% were male. Overall, at 6 months, mean (SD) OAB-SAT-q domain scores…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 403 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free