Evidence Hub

Efficacy of mirabegron, a β3 -adrenoreceptor agonist, in Japanese women with overactive bladder and either urgency urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence: Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies

Takahashi S, Mishima Y, Kuroishi K, Ukai M

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2022

214 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Objective: To confirm if mirabegron 50 mg shows efficacy in women with overactive bladder and either urgency urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence versus placebo.

Methods: Post-hoc analyses were carried out using pooled data from a Japanese phase IIb and a phase III study. The primary efficacy end-point was baseline to end-of-treatment change in the mean number of micturitions/24 h. The secondary end-points were changes in the mean voided volume/micturition, mean number of urgency and incontinence episodes/24 h, and mean number of nocturia episodes/night. Other end-points were quality of life and incontinence normalization rates.

Results: Women with urgency urinary incontinence (placebo n = 204, mirabegron n = 214) and mixed urinary incontinence (placebo n = 122, mirabegron n = 139) were included. Change in mean micturitions/24 h at end-of-treatment for mirabegron was statistically significant versus placebo in both populations; the effect size increased over time. For all secondary end-points, median changes for mirabegron were statistically significant versus placebo at end-of-treatment, except for nocturia for the urgency urinary incontinence population and urgency for the mixed urinary incontinence population. Mirabegron showed larger improvements versus placebo in all quality-of-life domains, except for general health perception in the urgency urinary incontinence population. Incontinence normalization rates for mirabegron were 47.2% and 49.6% in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 214 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free