Evidence Hub

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation may Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Brian Forsythe, J. Chahla, Avinaash Korrapati, Ophelie Z. Lavoie-Gagne, Enrico M. Forlenza, Connor C. Diaz, C. Chung, W. Bae et al.

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And Related, 2022

80 participants · 34 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) augmentation on clinical outcomes and MRI findings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) allografts.

METHODS

A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 patients undergoing ACLR using BTB allografts. Patients were randomized to two groups: 1) bone marrow aspirate (BMA) was collected from the iliac crest, concentrated, and approximately 2.5 ml was injected into the BTB allograft, or 2) a small sham incision was made at the iliac crest (control). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 3 months and 9 months post-operatively to determine the signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were available for follow-up at 1 year post-operatively (36 BMAC, 37 control). IKDC scores were significantly higher in the BMAC group versus the control at the nine-month post-operative period (81.6±10.5 vs 74.6±14.2, p=0.048). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for IKDC between the BMAC and control groups at 9 months (89% vs. 85%; p=0.7). Three months post-operatively, SIR of the inferior third of the ACL graft was significantly higher in the BMAC group versus the control group (3.2±2.2 vs 2.1±1.5; p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received BMAC augmentation of the BTB allograft during ALCR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free