Evidence Hub

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stent with or without coaxial plastic stent for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial

P. Vaněk, P. Falt, P. Vítek, V. Zoundjiekpon, Monika Horinkova, J. Zapletalová, M. Loveček, O. Urban

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2023

67 participants · 64 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have proven to be effective for drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), although associated adverse events (AE) have been reported. Anchoring coaxial double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) within LAMS have been proposed to prevent LAMS-related AEs, but have not been assessed in prospective studies. We aimed to evaluate the utility of such measures with a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

We randomly assigned consecutive patients with WON indications for drainage to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage using LAMS with (A) or without (B) DPS. All LAMS were to be extracted after 3 weeks had elapsed from the index procedure with a preceding CT scan to decide whether additional steps needed to be taken, e.g., transluminal necrosectomy, or placing transluminal plastic stents in patients with incomplete resolution of WON. Main outcomes included failure of the index method, defined as necessity of re-intervention (endoscopic, percutaneous, surgical) before LAMS extraction due to LAMS-related AEs and/or clinical deterioration, AE rates, and mortality with LAMS in place. Variables were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients (37.3% females, mean age 54 ± 14.4 years) underwent LAMS with (n = 34) or without DPS (n = 33) placement in two tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics including…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free