Evidence Hub

Ramelteon for prevention of post-operative delirium: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective pulmonary thromboendarterectomy

S. Jaiswal, Anuja Vyas, A. Heisel, Haritha Ackula, Ashna Aggarwal, Nick H. Kim, K. Kerr, M. Madani et al.

Critical Care Medicine, 2019

120 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of ramelteon in preventing delirium, an acute neuropsychiatric condition associated with increased morbidity and mortality, in the peri-operative, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. Design: Parallel-arm, randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled trial Setting: Academic medical center in La Jolla, California. Patients: Patients ≥ 18 years undergoing elective pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Interventions: Ramelteon 8 mg or matching placebo starting the night prior to surgery and for a maximum of six nights while in the ICU. Measurements: Incident delirium was measured twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method. The safety outcome was coma-free days assessed by the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale. Main Results: 120 participants were enrolled and analysis completed in 117. Delirium occurred in 22/58 patients allocated to placebo vs. 19/59 allocated to ramelteon (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.4; p = 0.516). Delirium duration, as assessed by the number of delirium-free days was also similar in both groups (placebo median 2 days (IQR 2 to 3) vs. ramelteon 3 (2 to 5); p=0.181). Coma-free days was also similar between groups (median placebo days 2 (IQR 1 to 3) vs. ramelteon 3 (2 to 4) days; p=0.210). We found no difference in ICU LOS [median 4 (IQR 3 to 5) vs. 4 (3 to 6) days, p = 0.349] or in-hospital mortality, (4 vs. 3 deaths, relative risk ratio 0.7, 95% CI 0.2 to 3.2; p=0.717), all placebo vs. ramelteon, respectively. Conclusions:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free