Evidence Hub

Early Weightbearing Versus Nonweightbearing After Operative Treatment of an Ankle Fracture: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

Jae Yong Park, B. Kim, Yu Mi Kim, Jae-ho Cho, Youngrak Choi, Hyongnyun Kim

American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2021

258 participants · 41 citations

Abstract

Background: Acute ankle fractures can occur during sports activities, and unstable ankle fractures are commonly treated operatively. However, controversy exists about the optimal time to allow weightbearing. Hypothesis: Early weightbearing after the stable fixation of an ankle fracture is not inferior to nonweightbearing in terms of ankle function assessed at 12 months after injury. Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 258 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these patients, 194 were randomly allocated to either the early weightbearing group (95 patients who were allowed weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperatively) or the nonweightbearing group (99 patients who were not allowed weightbearing until 6 weeks postoperatively). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference in the Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS) between the groups, assessed at the 12-month follow-up examination. The secondary outcome measures were the time to return to preinjury activities and patients’ subjective satisfaction. Complications such as hardware loosening or failure, fracture displacement, and nonunion were evaluated. Results: The mean difference in the OMAS for the early weightbearing group compared with the nonweightbearing group was 1.6 (95% CI, –1.9 to 5.0) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The lower limit of the 95% CI (–1.9) exceeded the noninferiority margin of –8, indicating that early weightbearing was not inferior to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 258 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free