Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of mirabegron in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Wang Li, Yanduo Lin, Hong Xie, Qiang Fu, Rong Chen, Xiaoyong Hu, Jianwen Huang, Jihong Wang et al.

Frontiers in Oncology, 2023

55 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of mirabegron in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and methods: A total of 108 post-operative RP patients were randomly assigned to either the mirabegron (study) or the placebo (control) group. The Overactive Bladder Syndrome Self-Assessment Scale (OABSS) was selected as the primary endpoint, and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QOL) score were selected as secondary endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26, and the treatment effects were compared between the two groups using independent samples t-test. Results: In total, 55 patients were included in the study group and 53 patients in the control group. The mean age was(70.08 ± 7.54)years. There was no statistical difference in the baseline data between the two groups. OABSS scores decreased significantly in the study group compared to the control group during drug treatment (6.67 ± 1.06 vs. 9.14 ± 1.83, p < 0.01) and were better than the control group during the follow-up at week 8 and week 12. In addition, the decrease in IPSS scores (11.29 ± 3.89 and 15.34 ± 3.54, p<0.01) and the increase in QOL scores (2.40 ± 0.81 vs. 3.20 ± 1.00) were statistically significant in the study group. And the patients in the study group had better improvement in voiding symptoms and quality of life than the control group during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Daily…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 55 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free