Evidence Hub

A network meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure patients

Shadi Abuhashem, Mohammed Aramin, A. Alhazmi, Ashanti Hameed, Leo Tom, Mohamed Alshahrani, Z. Alatawi, M. Ibraheim et al.

Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2026

80 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown promise in treating heart failure (HF), but the best choice among these drugs remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of different SGLT2is in HF patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted up until March 2023. These trials had to compare SGLT2i medications to a placebo in patients with HF. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization due to HF, and myocardial infarction (MI). Furthermore, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model and inverse variance statistics. Results: We included 16 RCTs involving 80 666 patients (43 743 on SGLT2 inhibitors, 36 923 on placebo). No SGLT2 inhibitor demonstrated a significant difference in all-cause mortality and MI compared to others. However, empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality by 20% (RR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93), including in patients with diabetes. All SGLT2 inhibitors lowered the risk of hospitalization for HF compared to placebo, except for canagliflozin. Sotagliflozin had the greatest reduction in hospitalizations (RR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.57–0.76), followed by empagliflozin (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.81). There were no significant differences among SGLT2…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free