Evidence Hub

The effects of sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors on hematocrit levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Wang X, Fu R, Liu H, Ma Y, Qiu X, Dong Z

Annals of palliative medicine, 2021

21,050 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors including improving glycemic control, lower body weight, uric acid-lowering effect and decreasing blood pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on hematocrit (Hct) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS: Embase, CENTRAL, PubMed and other databases were searched from the establishment of the database through to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated with SGLT2 inhibitors were analyzed using the random effects model. Stata 12.0 statistical software was used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS: A total of 40 RCTs were included, comprising 21,050 patients. SGLT2 inhibitors resulted in a significant increase in Hct levels compared to patients treated with a placebo (WMD 2.67%, 95% CI, 2.53 to 2.82; P0.05; WMD 2.24% and 2.64%, respectively for ertugliflozin; P>0.05).

DISCUSSION: SGLT2 inhibitors, as a class of drugs, increased Hct levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, and this increase was slightly more pronounced at higher doses compared to lower doses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study has been submitted to the PROSPERO platform (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/), and the registration number is CRD42020200699.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 21,050 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free