Evidence Hub

Co-occurrence of psychotic disorders and borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jourdan J, Estric C, O'Donoghue B, Chanen A, Schandrin A

Psychological medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: The co-occurrence of psychotic disorders and borderline personality disorder (BPD) complicates clinical management, with overlapping symptoms exacerbating morbidity and impairing therapeutic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychotic disorders and BPD co-occurrence, including with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and to describe associated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, four databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2025. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality appraisal (Effective Public Health Practice Project tool) were conducted independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled prevalence rates.

Results: The pooled prevalence of BPD in people with psychotic disorders was 22.7% (95% CI: 14.2–34.3%), while 14.3% (95% CI: 5.5–32.1%) of individuals with BPD had a comorbid psychotic disorder. In FEP samples, 40.0% (95% CI: 21.9–61.3%) met the criteria for BPD. People with both conditions, often young women, showed greater emotional dysregulation, suicidality, psychotic symptoms, and social dysfunction. Trauma, dissociation and substance use emerged as frequent vulnerability factors. However, most studies were cross-sectional, with small samples and high heterogeneity (I2 > 80%), limiting generalizability.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free