Evidence Hub

Predictors of spontaneous remission in school students with Internet use disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Y. Malygin, L. S. Zolotareva, A. Orlova, O. Mokienko, V. Malygin

Konsulʹtativnaâ Psihologiâ i Psihoterapiâ, 2025

Abstract

Context and relevance. Internet use disorders (IUDs), which include different types of behavioral addiction patterns related to inappropriate or excessive internet use, have become a major problem among children and adolescents. Objective. This study aims to explore which predictors favor spontaneous remission in school students with IUDs. Methods and materials. We systematically searched for relevant longitudinal cohort and case-control studies published in PubMed, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. Quantitative syntheses were performed. Results: The analysis includes 10 prospective studies published between 2007 and 2022. Overall, the spontaneous remission rate was 44,2%. A higher level of self-esteem predicted spontaneous IUD remission. Social and demographic predictors (age, sex, family relations, economic welfare, macrosocial adjustment, etc.), IUD score, social anxiety score, general anxiety score, and impulsiveness did not affect the probability of remission. Data on the significance of school performance, hostility and aggression, ADHD score, and frequency of daily internet use were conflicting. A lower depression score did not favor remission; however, a tendency was observed, and conflicting data on the role of severe depression should be noted. Conclusions. Interpersonal IUD remission predictors are less important compared to intrapersonal ones. Since intrapersonal (especially self-related) predictors are less well studied, further research is warranted to verify…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free