Evidence Hub

Problematic internet use and borderline personality features: A systematic review informed by the alternative model of personality disorders

Eve K. Chesivoir, Elizabeth Hernandez, S. Dolan

Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2026

21,358 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Associations between problematic internet use (PIU) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) have been reported, but the literature is highly heterogeneous, with some studies assessing overall BPD severity and others examining individual traits (e.g., emotional lability, impulsivity, dissociation). This review synthesizes these approaches using the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD), examining how BPD-relevant pathological personality traits (Criterion B) and impairments in self and interpersonal functioning (Criterion A) relate to PIU. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies examining associations between PIU (e.g., general use, social media, gaming, smartphone use) and personality traits or functioning in adults. Study quality was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Results Thirty studies (N = 21,358) met inclusion criteria. Emotional lability and impulsivity showed the most consistent associations with PIU across outcome types. Few studies examined impairments in personality functioning, but available evidence suggests that identity disturbance may predict PIU over time and that interpersonal dysfunction is associated with greater use of online environments for reassurance and emotion regulation. Associations involving dissociation and detachment were relatively weak and less…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 21,358 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free