Evidence Hub

Factors associated with eating behaviors of young and middle-aged adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review

Yan He, Yan-Jie Liu, Wanya Pan, Wenhao Tian, Yuan Zhao, Yunyu Guo, Xiu-Qin Feng

Frontiers in Public Health, 2026

7,614 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of overweight and obesity among young and middle-aged adults constitutes a significant public health challenge. While modifying dietary behavior is accepted as a critical component of weight management, existing reports regarding the specific drivers of these behaviors remain scattered and lack systematic integration. To address this knowledge gap, this review systematically synthesized the factors associated with eating behaviors within this demographic. Adhering strictly to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, a comprehensive search across seven electronic databases was conducted, identifying nine eligible cross-sectional studies comprising 7,614 participants. Narrative synthesis categorized the identified associated factors into three overarching themes: psycho-emotional factors, encompassing negative affective states, impulsivity, and emotion regulation deficits; socio-environmental stressors defined by occupational environments and interpersonal dynamics; and maladaptive behavioral patterns such as rapid eating rates and irregular meal timing. These findings critically indicate that eating behaviors in this population often serve as compensatory mechanisms for emotional and environmental strain rather than solely reflecting nutritional choices. Consequently, effective weight management strategies must extend beyond traditional dietary education to incorporate holistic approaches involving emotion…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,614 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free