Evidence Hub

Abstract 14100: Which Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Agent is More Effective in Patients With Heart Failure? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

A. Awad, Mohammed Tarek Hasan, Mohamed Shih, A. Attia, H. Aboeldahab, B. Abdelazeem, N. Baral, P. Savarapu et al.

Circulation, 2022

69,024 participants

Abstract

Background:

Treatment with various sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) has decreased cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to investigate which SGLT-2Is are more effective in patients with HF.

Methods:

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, were systematically searched from inception to February 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of SGLT-2Is vs. placebo in HF patients. The main outcomes were all-cause, cardiovascular mortality, serious adverse events, and hospitalizations due to HF. The random-effects method model and inverse variance statistics were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results:

Our study included 12 RCTs with a total number of 69,024 patients (37,923 in the SGLT2 inhibitors group and 31,101 in the placebo group). Five RCTs used empagliflozin, 4 used dapagliflozin, 1 used canagliflozin, 1 used ertugliflozin, and 1 used sotagliflozin. Our analysis showed that empagliflozin has a statistically significant lowest odds for both cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse effects (OR: 0.80 with 95% CI [0.67-0.96]) and (OR: 0.84 with 95% CI [0.76-0.93]), respectively compared to other SGLT-2Is. All SGLT-2Is have been associated with the same lower odds without preferences for one over the others regarding all-cause mortality. Furthermore, the hospitalization rate due to HF showed a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 69,024 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free