Evidence Hub

Subtyping patients with binge-eating disorder by dietary restraint and negative affect: Characteristics and treatment outcome

Dounchis JZ, Karam AM, Stein RI, Wilfley DE

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2021

159 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study examined patients with binge-eating disorder (BED) subtyped by dietary restraint (DR) and the negative affect (NA) dimension of depression, anxiety, hostility, and self-esteem, comparing clinical features and outcome of evidence-based psychological treatments. It was hypothesized that individuals with DR and high NA (DR-HNA) would have lower functioning and poorer immediate and long-term BED treatment outcomes compared to those with DR and low NA (DR-LNA).

Method: Cluster analysis was conducted (n = 159) as a secondary analysis of data from a randomized group cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy trial of women and men with BED.

Results: At pretreatment, participants with DR-HNA were higher in eating disorder and general psychopathology, emotional eating, and poor social adjustment. At post-treatment, differences in binge days between cluster groups were small and statistically nonsignificant, and differences in rates of binge-eating abstinence were only marginally significant. However, by 1-year follow-up, patients with DR-HNA had a greater increase in binge days, less abstinence from binge eating, a higher risk for relapse, and were significantly less likely to be in BED remission than those with DR-LNA.

Conclusions: DR-HNA served as a predictor of poorer maintenance of BED therapeutic improvement. Future directions to better sustain outcomes among patients with DR-HNA include developing a brief measure to assess for the full…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free