Evidence Hub

Metacognitive Interpersonal Group Therapy for Adolescents With Personality Disorders: Results From the METAMIND-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

F. Inchausti, Nancy V. García-Poveda, Alejandro Ballesteros-Prados, E. Fonseca-Pedrero, A. MacBeth, R. Popolo, Giancarlo Dimaggio

Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

AIM

This pilot RCT evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of Metacognitive Interpersonal Group Therapy for Adolescents (MIT-GA) compared with waiting list plus treatment-as-usual (WL+TAU).

METHODS

One hundred adolescents (14-18 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for PDs (excluding antisocial PD) were randomized to MIT-GA or WL+TAU for 4 months. Primary outcomes included treatment acceptability, psychosocial functioning (CGAS, IIP-64), and symptom severity (SCL-90-R GSI). Secondary outcomes were depression (Y-BDI), caregiver stress (PSS), and parental self-efficacy (BPSES). Mechanisms of change included metacognition (MAS-A), alexithymia (TAS-20), and impulsivity (BIS-11).

RESULTS

MIT-GA participants showed greater improvements in psychosocial functioning (d = 0.80) and parental stress (d = 0.65) versus WL+TAU. No significant between-group differences were found in overall symptom severity. MIT-GA also improved metacognition, alexithymia, and attentional impulsivity. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the feasibility and potential utility of MIT-GA for adolescents with PDs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free