Evidence Hub

Acute impact of self-guided mental imagery on craving in cocaine use disorder: a mixed-methods analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Natalie Lowry, J. Marsden, Bethany Clydesdale, B. Eastwood, E. Havelka, C. Goetz

Addiction, 2021

7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mental imagery manipulations are used to treat several psychological disorders, but their utility in treating cocaine use disorder (CUD) is unknown. Using prompted re-experiences and simulations with contrasting valence, we assessed the acute impact of a deliberate mental imagery task on cocaine craving.

DESIGN

A quantitative-qualitative 'mixed-methods' analysis of data collected for a randomised controlled trial that was stopped prematurely.

SETTING

UK National Health Service addictions treatment clinic and outpatient clinical research facility (laboratory).

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with CUD. The original target sample was 120. All participants enrolled at the point the original trial was stopped were included (38 enrolled, 31 completed study).

INTERVENTIONS

Personalised (3-minute) cue-exposure (handling cocaine paraphernalia and watching video of drug preparation), immediately followed by a single 5-minute, audio-recorded, self-guided and verbally described imagery task with random assignment to one of four conditions: two mental imagery memory re-experiences (positive image before initiation to cocaine use or a negative image of a 'worst time' adverse cocaine use episode) or two future simulations (positive theme of CUD or negative theme of worsened CUD).

MEASUREMENTS

Task transcripts were rated for imagery detail using five dimensions using a six-point scale of imagery detail (ID total score: 0-25) and thematically coded. The outcome measure was cocaine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free