Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin improves left ventricular ejection fraction and end systolic volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: a post-hoc analysis of EMPA-CARD trial

Samin Ghanbari, Sepehr Gohari, Tara Reshadmanesh, Mahsa Mahjani, Shahram Arsang-Jang, Faramarz Ismail-Beigi, Mohsen Dadashi, Hossein Chiti et al.

Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Sodium glucose co-transporter2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have exhibited cardioprotective properties in diabetes patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Empagliflozin on changes in echocardiographic parameters.

Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the EMPA-CARD trial which was a multicenter, triple-blind randomized controlled trial. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with concomitant history of coronary artery disease were randomized on a 1:1 ratio into two groups receiving either 10 mg/day Empagliflozin or placebo. Patients with a history of heart failure (NYHA class 3-4) and ejection fraction (EF) < 40% were excluded. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was performed at baseline and at 26 weeks of intervention.

Results: A total of 69 (Empagliflozin = 39 and placebo = 30) patients underwent echocardiography. Significant changes were observed for left ventricular ejection fraction [standard error (SE) = 0.76; beta (95% correlation interval (CrI)] = -5.558 (-7.25; -4.18) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (SE = 1.38; beta (95% CrI) = 3.915 (1.2; 0.66). Other echocardiographic parameters relating to right ventricular or atrial function did not change significantly.

Conclusion: Empagliflozin can have cardioprotective benefits in subjects without HF. Further studies are required to determine the effect of Empagliflozin in non-HF patients.

Trial registration: The original EMPA-CARD study has been registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free