Evidence Hub

Exploring the profile and risk factors associated with self-harm ideation and behaviors in adolescents with high psychoticism

Xu XM, Jiang RH, Han YS, Wang W, Ai M, Chen JM, Cao J, Chen XR et al.

Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025

6,027 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: As a core personality trait closely linked to mental health outcomes, psychoticism warrants particular attention in adolescent populations. The association between elevated psychoticism levels and self-harm ideation and behaviors (SIB) remained insufficiently characterized, especially regarding specific risk profiles. This study aims to delineate SIB characteristics and identify risk factors among adolescents with high psychoticisme.

Methods: In this large scale cross-sectional study, 6,027 adolescents aged 16-18 years scoring ≥70th percentile on the psychoticism dimension (Revised Short Form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, EPQ-RSC) were recruited from 63 schools. Data on demographic characteristics and SIB patterns were collected via standardized electronic questionnaires through a secure online platform. Binary logistic regression analyses with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) identified significant SIB predictors.

Results: Adolescents with high psychoticism demonstrated striking SIB prevalence patterns: 62.8% reported life meaninglessness, 47.2% expressed death wishes, and 34.7% acknowledged suicidal/NSSI ideation within the past year, with 27% specifically endorsing such ideation within the past month. Actual self-harm rates were 4.7% (lifetime), 1.64% (past year), and 0.37% (past month). Predominant triggers included family conflicts (32.9%), while primary motives centered on pain alleviation (51%). SIB incidence showed significant dose-response…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 6,027 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free