Evidence Hub

A latent profile analysis of child maltreatment and its psychosocial correlates in a sample of school-aged adolescents

E. Suárez-Soto, M. Arqueros, A. García-Ramos, W. Ayad-Ahmed, A. Pedrola-Pons, Díaz-De Las Heras Inés, A. de la Torre-Luque

International Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect, 2026

1,526 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Child maltreatment is a major public health concern associated with a wide range of adverse mental health and behavioral outcomes in adolescence.

OBJECTIVE

To identify latent profiles of childhood maltreatment in a community sample of adolescents in Spain and to examine whether these profiles differ across theoretically relevant emotional, behavioral, interpersonal, and clinical outcomes. As a secondary aim, the study explored whether maltreatment profile membership was associated with the severity of suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

A total of 1526 adolescents (54.3% girls; mean age = 13.8 years, SD = 1.27) from secondary schools in Madrid completed standardized self-report measures of maltreatment, psychopathology, and risk behaviors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Latent profile analysis based on Childhood Trauma Questionnaire subscales was used to identify maltreatment profiles. Differences between latent profiles were examined using t-tests and chi-square analyses. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) severity.

RESULTS

Two profiles were identified: a High Maltreatment Exposure Profile (7.5%) and a Low Exposure Profile (92.5%). Compared to the low-exposure group, adolescents in the high-exposure profile-who were more likely to be girls- showed significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms, suicidal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,526 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free