Evidence Hub

Psychiatric, Neurological, and Somatic Comorbidities in Intermittent Explosive Disorder: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records

Y. Zhang-James, John Paliakkara, Joshua Schaeffer, J. Strayhorn, S. Faraone

medRxiv, 2024

30,357 participants

Abstract

Importance: Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED) is an understudied psychiatric condition that presents with repeated episodes of impulsive aggression and poorly regulated emotional control, often resulting in interpersonal and societal consequences. Better understanding of comorbidities will allow for enhanced screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients. Objective: To investigate prevalence and associations of IED with psychiatric, neurological, and somatic disorders using real-world data Design: Matched cohorts of patients with or without IED diagnosis were identified using data from the TriNetX Research Network (until January 31, 2024). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate and compare the probabilities of acquiring other diagnoses using patients' available medical records. Setting: Analysis of electronic medical records from two patient populations. Participants: 30,357 individuals with IED and equal number of demographically matched individ-uals without IED from the TriNetX Research. Exposure: IED diagnosis identified through the associated ICD codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were ICD-10-CM diagnostic categories and root codes for disorders and health conditions in both cohorts. Main measures are total numbers and proportions of patients who had the diagnostic codes, as well as adjusted hazard ratios for IED diagnosis. Results: Although only 0.03% of the total patient population had an IED diagnosis, we found ex-tensive and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 30,357 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free