Evidence Hub

Antagonistic Narcissism in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Case-Control Study

Philipp Wülfing, Nikolaus Krämer, Claas-Hinrich Lammers, Carsten Spitzer

Psychopathology, 2025

51 participants

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by instability in self-image, emotions, and relationships. Features such as (auto)aggression, devaluation, and impulsivity indicate proximity to narcissistic traits, especially antagonistic aspects. While its links to grandiose and vulnerable narcissism are established, the role of antagonistic narcissism (AN) remains unclear. This study investigates AN in BPD by comparing female BPD patients with a diagnostically heterogeneous clinical control group without personality disorders and by examining its associations with symptom severity, self-harm, aggression, interpersonal problems, and empathy. Methods: 51 female BPD patients and 51 clinical control patients completed the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire and measures of borderline symptomatology, aggression, interpersonal problems, and empathy. Group comparisons were conducted using analyses of covariance, and Spearman correlations examined relationships between clinical characteristics. Interpersonal tendencies of AN were analyzed via the Structural Summary Method (SSM). Results: BPD patients showed higher levels of AN compared to the control group (η2 = 0.04), though this difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.050). AN correlated positively with overall aggression (r = 0.34, p < 0.05), particularly verbal aggression (r = 0.43, p < 0.01). SSM analysis positioned AN within the domineering-vindictive quadrant of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 51 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free