Evidence Hub

Individual Differences in the Associations between Risk Factors for Alcohol Use Disorder and Alcohol Use-Related Outcomes

Angela M. Haeny, R. Gueorguieva, Asti Jackson, M. Morean, S. Krishnan-Sarin, Kelly S. DeMartini, G. Pearlson, A. Anticevic et al.

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2021

757 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background. Family history of alcohol use disorder (FH+) and impulsivity-related traits are known risk factors for problem drinking that have been investigated in predominately White samples. This cross-sectional study examined whether these risk factors vary by sex in the overall, majority White sample and in a Black subsample. Methods. A model building regression procedure was used to investigate the combined effect of FH+ and impulsivity-related traits on alcohol quantity, frequency, and problems by sex (overall sample: N=757, 50% female, 73% White, agemean=33.74, SD=11.60; Black subsample: n=138, 47% female, agemean=33.60, SD=9.87). Results. Overall Sample. No sex differences were found in the compounding effects of FH+ and impulsivity-related traits on alcohol outcomes. Males reported more physical, social, and overall alcohol-related problems than females. FH+ was positively associated with all alcohol-related consequences. Poor self-regulation was the only trait associated with all alcohol outcomes. Black Subsample. A three-way interaction suggested a negative association between inhibition and frequency of alcohol use among FH+ males only. A two-way interaction also suggested impulse control was associated with more interpersonal alcohol-related problems among males only. Main effects were also found in the expected direction such that higher impulsivity and FH+ were associated with poorer alcohol outcomes. Conclusion. These findings suggest no sex differences in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 757 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free