Evidence Hub

Comparison of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in HF patients on dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin

P. Wilson, B. Miles, M. Sills

European Heart Journal, 2024

9,841 participants

Abstract

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are devastating tachyarrhythmias that can cause sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure (HF) if not anticipated or treated promptly. Although post-hoc analysis in DAPA-HF showed promise in their benefit, Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have not yet been evaluated for their effect on these tachyarrhythmias. This retrospective analysis aims to compare the 2 most commonly used SGLT2i agents, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, and the incidence of VT in patients with HF.

The TriNetX Research network was used for this study. The two initial patient cohorts were created using ICD-10 codes and medication codes from the TriNetX platform. Both cohorts consisted of patients over age 60 with a history of heart failure and either VF or VT. One cohort was on treatment with dapagliflozin and the other with empagliflozin. The cohorts were balanced by propensity score matching and the greedy nearest neighbor algorithm for age, gender, race, ethnicity, hyperkalemia, and the current use of spironolactone, amiodarone, metoprolol, and carvedilol, resulting in 9,841 patients in each arm. The cohorts were then evaluated for the development of VF or VT over the subsequent five years as well as all-cause mortality. Additional cohorts were created to evaluate dapagliflozin vs empagliflozin in diabetics, nondiabetics, and patients with ejection fractions less than 35%

Dapagliflozin was associated with an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9,841 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free