Evidence Hub

Development of an Animal Phenotype of Gambling Disorder: Chronic Reward Uncertainty Induces a Gambling Disorder-like State of Sensitization and Dysfunctional Decision-Making

Victoria Fugariu

TSpace (University of Toronto), 2018

Abstract

Gambling Disorder (GD) is a behavioural addiction whose etiology is uncertain. Thus, it is unclear whether repeated exposure to uncertainty may induce a GD-like phenotype (indicated by dopamine (DA) sensitization and risky decision-making). Therefore, rats were trained to nose-poke on a Fixed/Variable Ratio (FR/VR) schedule of reinforcement to activate a conditioned stimulus (CS) that predicted saccharin 50/100% of time (CS50/100%). Following 66 sessions, the VR+CS100% and VR+CS50% rats demonstrated a locomotor sensitization (index of DA sensitization) to a d-amphetamine (AMPH) challenge, while only the VR+CS50% group showed impaired decision-making on the rat gambling task. To determine whether sensitization mediated impaired decision-making in the VR+CS50% group, effects of a sensitizing d-AMPH regimen on decision-making were assessed, and revealed a parallel pattern of impairment. Thus, repeated exposure to a VR schedule is implicated in a d-AMPH-like sensitization that interacted with the uncertain CS50% to mediate dysfunctional decision-making.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a thesis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free