Evidence Hub

Genetically-Driven Enhancement of Dopaminergic Transmission Affects Moral Acceptability in Females but Not in Males: A Pilot Study

Silvia Pellegrini, Sara Palumbo, Caterina Iofrida, Erika Melissari, Giuseppina Rota, Veronica Mariotti, Teresa Anastasio, Andrea Manfrinati et al.

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2017

200 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Moral behavior has been a key topic of debate for philosophy and psychology for a long time. In recent years, thanks to the development of novel methodologies in cognitive sciences, the question of how we make moral choices has expanded to the study of neurobiological correlates that subtend the mental processes involved in moral behavior. For instance, in vivo brain imaging studies have shown that distinct patterns of brain neural activity, associated with emotional response and cognitive processes, are involved in moral judgment. Moreover, while it is well-known that responses to the same moral dilemmas differ across individuals, to what extent this variability may be rooted in genetics remains yet to be understood. Because dopamine is a key modulator of neural processes underlying executive functions, we questioned whether genetic polymorphisms associated to decision-making and to dopaminergic neurotransmission modulation would contribute to the observed variability in moral judgment. To this aim, we genotyped five genetic variants of the dopaminergic pathway (rs1800955 in the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene, DRD4 48bp variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR), solute carrier family 6 member 3 (SLC6A3) 40bp VNTR, rs4680 in the catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) gene and rs1800497 in the ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing 1 (ANKK1) gene) in 200 subjects, who were requested to answer to 56 moral dilemmas. As these variants are all located in genes belonging to the…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free