Evidence Hub

AI-Powered Triage of Suicidal Ideation in Adolescents: A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models Using Synthetic Clinical Vignettes

Masab A. Mansoor

medRxiv, 2025

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the performance of leading Large Language Models (LLMs) in classifying suicide risk and generating clinically appropriate action plans for adolescent psychiatric cases presented through synthetic clinical vignettes. Methods We developed 40 synthetic clinical vignettes depicting adolescents with varying levels of suicide risk, structured according to established clinical formulation principles. A gold standard for risk level, based on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) framework, and corresponding clinical actions was established for each vignette by a panel of two board-certified child and adolescent psychiatrists. Three LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3.1-70B) were prompted using a structured chain-of-thought methodology to classify risk and propose a detailed action plan. Performance was assessed using quantitative classification metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score) and qualitative thematic analysis of the generated action plans. Results Quantitative analysis of risk classification revealed variable performance. GPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy (82.5%), followed by Claude 3.5 Sonnet (75.0%) and Llama-3.1-70B (67.5%). F1-scores demonstrated challenges in correctly identifying higher-risk categories, particularly for nuanced presentations of intent. Qualitative thematic analysis of the action plans identified consistent adherence to basic safety protocols (e.g., recommending emergency evaluation for…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free