Evidence Hub

Comparative Risk of Glaucoma in Patients Using Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Metformin: A Multinational Cohort Study

Pan SY, Weng CH, Tsai SF, Sheen YJ, Lin JF, Lin CH, Wang IJ, Chou CC

American journal of ophthalmology, 2026

32,634 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and metformin on the risk of glaucoma-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

DESIGN

Multinational, retrospective clinical cohort study using patient data from 160 healthcare organizations across 21 countries.

SUBJECTS

Adults with T2DM who initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or metformin during 2013-2023 were included.

INTERVENTION

Patients with T2DM prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors were compared to those prescribed metformin. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching to balance age, sex, race, glycated hemoglobin, body mass index, medications, and comorbidities between the SGLT2 inhibitor and metformin groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The occurrence of ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and the need for glaucoma medications.

RESULTS

Our final analysis included 32,634 patients prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and 32,634 prescribed metformin. Compared to metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with significantly lower risks of ocular hypertension (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.89), POAG (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.81), and the need for glaucoma medications (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) in 5 years. These associations remain consistent in patients aged ≥60 years, females, males, Whites, and those prescribed empagliflozin.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with T2DM, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors may be associated with lower risks of ocular…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 32,634 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free