Ischemic penile necrosis following embolization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A case report
Abstract
Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) provides a minimally invasive approach for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by occluding prostatic arteries to decrease prostate volume. While offering benefits, PAE can lead to severe complications, such as ischemic necrosis of the penis, due to unintended embolization of penile arteries. This is highlighted by the case of a 62-year-old man who, after PAE, suffered from glans necrosis accompanied by intense perineal pain and acute urinary retention. Although conservative treatment facilitated recovery, his erectile function remains compromised and urinary symptoms have worsened. This underscores the importance of discussing potential risks and alternatives with patient.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Erectile dysfunction
- Testosterone protects from metabolic syndrome-associated prostate inflammation: an experimental study in rabbit
- Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes and lower urinary tract symptoms
- Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: important signaling modulators and therapeutic targets
- Chronic bladder ischemia and oxidative stress: New pharmacotherapeutic targets for lower urinary tract symptoms
- The role of prostate inflammation and fibrosis in lower urinary tract symptoms
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.