Evidence Hub

The impact of minimally invasive surgical therapy for Benign prostatic hyperplasia on sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ellen M. Cahill, M. M. Lindenbaum, Alexander Estright, B. Ljubetic, Vivek Aslot, Neil Nero, Smita De, P. Bajic et al.

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2026

11,477 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) can significantly impair a man's quality of life. While traditional surgical treatments are effective, they often pose risks to sexual function, particularly in the form of ejaculatory and/or erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) have emerged as alternative procedures that aim to alleviate LUTS while preserving sexual function.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the impact of MISTs for BPH on sexual function including erectile and ejaculatory function.

METHODS

In May 2025, a systematic review and meta-analysis of sexual function outcomes in MISTs was performed using the Ovid, Embase, and Medline/PubMed databases. Articles were included if they were in English, assessed a MIST, and incorporated sexual function outcomes. Articles were excluded if they included pooled analyses, were abstracts without full text, and/or were ongoing incomplete clinical trials. We included studies on water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum), prostatic urethral lift (Urolift), prostatic artery embolization (PAE), temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND), Optilume BPH catheter system, and transperineal laser ablation (TPLA). Outcomes included erectile function using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores and ejaculatory function using the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ).

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 2646 studies. After screening and full text review, 77…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 11,477 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free