Evidence Hub

Prevalence of urinary symptoms in women with parametrial endometriosis - Systematic review and meta-analysis

A. Teixeira, R. Vieira, M. Martinho, D. Raimondo, Alberto Aguzzi, N. Salmeri, L. Lazzeri, A. Raffone et al.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of urinary symptoms in women with parametrial endometriosis before and after surgery.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus through March 2025, with no language or publication year restrictions. Reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were also screened.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting pre- and/or postoperative urinary symptoms in women with parametrial endometriosis were included. A systematic review and meta-analysis, including 21 articles, was conducted.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data were extracted and categorized into dysuria, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and voiding dysfunction. Preoperatively, dysuria affected 15% (95% CI: 5-35) of women, with a mean VAS score of 1.10 (95% CI: 0.90-1.30). LUTS affected 27% (95% CI: 10-56), with a mean BFLUTS score of 13.23 (95% CI: -1.26-27.72). Voiding dysfunction was scarcely reported before surgery. Postoperatively, the prevalence of LUTS decreased to 13% (95% CI: 7-25), and the mean BFLUTS score to 7.84 (95% CI: -0.36-16.03). Voiding dysfunction was experienced in 14% of women (95% CI: 5-32), and 12% were symptoms that persisted after discharge (95% CI: 6-23). Subgroup analysis suggested a trend toward lower postoperative voiding dysfunction prevalence in patients with uterosacral involvement compared with those with lateral parametrium involvement.

CONCLUSION

Urinary symptoms are common in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free