Evidence Hub

Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle function and lower urinary tract symptoms in stroke patients: a systematic review

Xuan Zhang, Yiying Mai, Xi-Quan Hu

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 2022

4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in stroke patients. Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a promising intervention, its effects on stroke patients have not been fully studied. Objective The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the effect of PFMT on PFM and urinary function of stroke patients. Methods The databases AMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro were searched for title/abstract on PFMT and stroke. RCTs and quasi-experimental trials that compared the effects of PFMT to a control intervention in stroke patients were included. The RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The Standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results The current review included three RCTs and one quasi-experimental study, all of which were moderate to high quality. The analysis revealed that PFMT significantly improved PFM contraction (SMD: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.38; p < .0001), dynamic endurance (SMD: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.16; p = .030), daytime frequency (SMD: −0.81; 95% CI, −1.37 to −0.25; p = .004), ICIQ-SF (SMD: −1.64; 95% CI, −2.39 to −0.89; p < .0001), and LUTS (SMD: −1.82; 95% CI, −2.67 to −0.96; p < .0001). Differences in PFM strength, static endurance, nocturia, UI frequency, and 24-hour pad weight were insignificant or non-existent between the two groups. Conclusion…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free