Evidence Hub

Anterograde ejaculation preservation after endoscopic treatments in patients with bladder outlet obstruction: systematic review and pooled-analysis of randomized clinical trials

G. Cacciamani, Frederico Cuhna, A. Tafuri, A. Shakir, A. Cocci, K. Gill, J. Gómez-Rivas, A. Dourado et al.

Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology, 2019

24 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the high rate of resolution, ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) still is the most common side effect related to surgical treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate how several technological treatment modalities for the management of LUTS/BOO compare in terms of functional and sexual outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

All English language randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing the impact of different endoscopic treatments for BOO were evaluated. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement to evaluate PubMed®, Scopus®, and Web of ScienceTM databases (up to June 2019).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Our electronic search identified a total of 2221 papers in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Of these, 142 publications were identified for detailed review, which yielded 21 included in the present systematic review. All groups appeared similar with regards to preoperative IPSS/AUA score, Qmax, and prostate volume (cc). Patients undergoing endoscopic treatments using ThuLEP, Greenlight or Prostate Artery Embolization techniques had lower-but not statistically significant- relative risk (RR) of retrograde ejaculation compared with conventional TURP (RR:0.90;p=0.35; RR: 0.71; p=0.1; RR0.73; p=0.11). Efficacy of those techniques was equal to TURP.

CONCLUSIONS

Data reporting anterograde ejaculation preservation after endoscopic treatment in patients with BPE…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free